ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Religion & Law

: Constitutionally Correct

Protecting Our Children or Upholding Free Speech: Does One Exclude the Other? United States v. Williams

By Alliance Alert

ADVERTISEMENTS
Mercer Law Review: "In United States v. Williams, the most recent case evaluating the constutionality of the PROTECT Act, the United States Supreme Court held that the Act's pandering provision was constitutional. According to the Court, the PROTECT Act's pandering provision was neither overbroad nor impermissibly vague. For the time being, this decision identifies the PROTECT Act as a valuable tool for prosecutors charged with combating child pornography. However, like the child pornography statutes that came before it, the PROTECT Act will continue to face a bevy of constitutional challenges."

Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 03, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun

Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County

Missing Children
Databases and organizations

Lawsuits and Settlements

Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.

Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico

ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.

United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers

Sherwin-Williams
Recalls Krylon UV Fabric Protector due to Respiratory Hazard

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)