Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Marler BlogH.R. 759 Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009 - Food Safety Legislation - Good or Bad for Small, Sustainable, Organic, Locavores?
By Bill Marler, Esq.
There has been much in the way of worry by farmers, especially the small, sustainable, organic, locavores about the new food safety legislation. I have read the latest version of the draft H.R. 759 and here are some thoughts on its impact on small farmer/producer/manufacturers, as well as some other thoughts.
$1000 fee for all 'food facilities.'
This specifically exempts farms, but we get back to the problems of who a food 'manufacturer' is that we deal with in our cases. For example, is a seller at a farmer's market who washes and bags cherries that they grew a 'manufacturer'?
Traceability.
The industry standard traceability software section could be troublesome, however, Section 107(c)(4) provides and exemption from the requirements for food that is sold directly from farmers to consumers
Imports.
Will the fact that the bill allows the FDA to require food to be certified as meeting safety standards by foreign governments make food safer? What about China, for example? Should we rely on their governmental inspection abilities after the powdered milk crisis?
Also, guidelines for imported foods - importers meeting the guidelines will receive expedited processing if they meet the guidelines. Section 805 is a bit vague about the impact of this. Provisions like this typically favor those producers with more resources that are easily able to get certified - favoring big agriculture? Why is the foreign inspectorate corps funded and staffed at the Secretary's whim, but the local food safety FDA program is funded by the $1000 mandatory fees?
What about past problems?
As an aside, Section 105(4)(B) states that a company such as PCA would have been a Category 2 'low risk' facility, requiring random inspections as little as every three years. Would that have prevented the outbreak and deaths?
I'm going to read this again. Bottom line, it is time for us all to engage on this and the various other bills perking in the Halls of Congress.
Full post as published by Marler Blog on May 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Firestone Tire Problems Raise Questions of Safety
Are Your Car Tires Safe?
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Pet Food Recall
Diamond Pet Food sets up $3.1 million class action fund for substandard dog food.
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...
PETCO
Animal Food Distribution Unsanitary, Food Seized
Menu Food
$240,000 settlement reached in Hawaii class action contaminated pet food suit.
Safety Violations
Murphy Oil USA Inc. to pay $179,100 settlement in occupational safety violations lawsuit.

Statement by the President on House Passage of the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009
House and Senate Food Safety Bills
Food Safety Bill H.R. 2749 passes House
New Food Safety Legislation and Non-Industrial Scale Food Production
The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009: HR 875
Food safety culture and marketing go together
President Presses for Food-Safety Overhaul
Citizen civil actions under HR 875 (Food Safety Modernization Act)







