ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

Conrad Black requests bail from Supreme Court

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

ADVERTISEMENTS
[JURIST] Defense counsel for Canadian-born media mogul Conrad Black on Thursday submitted an application for bail pending appeal to Justice John Paul Stevens of the US Supreme Court. The application for bail follows the Supreme Court's recent grant of certiorari in Black's case, appealing his fraud conviction. The appeal challenges the appellate court's interpretation of the "honest services" clause of 18 USC § 1346, claiming that the clause does not apply where there is no finding that the defendant "reasonably contemplated identifiable economic harm" under mail and wire fraud law. Pursuant to 18 USC § 3143, a defendant is entitled to bail if a judicial officer finds "by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community" if released, if the appeal raises a "substantial question of law or fact" that is likely to result in the defendant's favor and if the request is not for the purposes of delay. In the motion, Black's lawyers stipulate that:There was no dispute in the district court or the court of appeals that Mr. Black is unlikely to flee, that he poses no danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released on conditions, and that he pursues his appeal for a legitimate reason and not for purposes of delay. The district court found in Mr. Black's favor on each point, by court of appeals. Accordingly, the sole issue is whether Mr. Black has "raise a substantial question of law or fact" likely to result in at least a new trial should he prevail on that question.Black's lawyers point out that co-petitioner John Boultbee was granted bail based on the same substantial question. Black, former chairman of Hollinger International, originally faced 17 counts of fraud, obstruction of justice, racketeering and tax evasion. He was accused by the US government of diverting more than $80 million from the company and its shareholders during Hollinger's $2.1 billion sale of several hundred Canadian newspapers. In 2007, Black was convicted of mail fraud and obstruction of justice and sentenced to 78 months in prison. The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit initially rejected Black's appeal, holding that § 1346 may be applied in a private setting regardless of whether the defendant's conduct risked any foreseeable economic harm to the victim. The outcome of the Court's review may affect other high-profile corporate fraud cases such as that involving Enron ex-CEO Jeffrey Skilling.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on May 29, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)