Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> EU Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: EU Law BlogReview Procedure before the Court of Justice: Draft Amendments to the Rules of Procedure
By Bartolus
The Court of First Instance shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions or proceedings brought against decisions of the judicial panels set up under Article 225a.Article 225 § 3 EC provides:
Decisions given by the Court of First Instance under this paragraph may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Community law being affected.
The Court of First Instance shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine questions referred for a preliminary ruling under Article 234, in specific areas laid down by the Statute.
Where the Court of First Instance considers that the case requires a decision of principle likely to affect the unity or consistency of Community law, it may refer the case to the Court of Justice for a ruling.
Decisions given by the Court of First Instance on questions referred for a preliminary ruling may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Community law being affected.
Work has now started in the Council, it seems, for the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice to be amended to accommodate the "review procedure" referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 above.
First, there is a draft Council Decision specifying the language rules to be applied to the review procedure. Such a decision is needed because Article 64 of the Statute of the Court of Justice requires such a decision to be adopted by the Council acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission. The draft proposes that the language of the review procedure be that of the decision of the Court of First Instance to be reviewed.
A separate draft decision spells out the procedure for review and how the Court shall decide on the proposal of the First Advocate General as specified in Article 62 of the Statute.
Full post as published by EU Law Blog on February 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Urgent Procedure Adopted for Preliminary Rulings in the Area of Freedom, Security & Justice
Ohio "commercial docket" Rules of Superintendence/ Criminal & Civil Procedure, including EDD
Ind. Courts - Proposed amendments to Court rules
Preliminary Draft of Proposed Amendments to Federal Rules








