ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Antitrust Review

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Antitrust Review

FTC Seeks Comments On Revised Petroleum Market Manipulation Rule

By David Fischer

ADVERTISEMENTS

Yesterday, the FTC announced it was seeking public comments on its proposed revised rule “that would prohibit market manipulation in the petroleum industry.”  According to the FTC:

The revised proposed rule in the RNPRM announced today retains the anti-fraud approach of the August 2008 proposed rule. The revised proposed rule would prohibit fraudulent and deceptive conduct that could harm wholesale petroleum markets. Specific examples of prohibited conduct include false public announcements of planned pricing or output decisions, false statistical or data reporting, and wash sales intended to disguise the actual liquidity or price of a particular product or market for that product. The revised proposed rule also would prohibit material omissions from a statement that, although otherwise literally true, are misleading under the circumstances.

Specifically, the revised proposed rule would prohibit anyone, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of crude oil, gasoline, or petroleum distillates at wholesale, from (a) knowingly engaging in any act, practice, or course of business ? including the making of any untrue statement of material fact ? that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, or (b) intentionally failing to state a material fact that under the circumstances renders a statement made by such person misleading, provided that such omission distorts or tends to distort market conditions for any such product.

The revised proposed rule would not impose any affirmative duties, obligations, or record-keeping requirements. Anyone violating an FTC rule promulgated under EISA, such as the revised proposed rule, if adopted, may face civil penalties of up to $1 million per violation per day, in addition to any relief available to the Commission under the FTC Act.

The proposed revised rule can be found here.

Full post as published by Antitrust Review on April 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (new cache)