ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights

Truck Drivers Take Arbitration Highway To Overtime Class Action

By Mark E. Tabakman, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

As I have written, employees need not file class actions in a court in order to band together to seek overtime monies. Arbitration is a distinct possibility. In the recent case of Franco v Athens Disposal Company, Inc., a California appeals court has held that a trial court erred when it held that a class-action waiver in a company's arbitration agreement was enforceable. The Company had initially defended by asserting that the employee, a truck driver, was exempt from overtime under the motor carrier exemption, but the Court ruled that this was also for the arbitrator to decide.

The trial court also misinterpreted a decision of the California Supreme Court finding that a class-arbitration waiver was unconscionable when prohibition of relief for all of the putative class members would undermine vindication of the employees' statutory rights to overtime, which they could not legally waive. The trial court had held that this holding did not apply to a driver's state-law claims against his employer for not providing meal and rest periods or pay additional compensation for missed meal/rest periods.

The employer had contended the meal and rest period 'rights' were subject to waiver. The appeals court held that, as state law required employers to comply with provisions of state Wage Orders, which mandated meal and rest breaks and since the law stated that no provision of law could be set aside by a private agreement, the statutory right to meal and rest periods could not be waived.

In sum, the court ruled that the class-arbitration waiver in the company's arbitration agreement was unenforceable, where the driver (and other employees) alleged violations of California law regarding meal and rest periods. The court believed that class arbitration would be a more effective way of vindicating the employees' statutory rights than individual arbitrations, given that the size of the potential individual recovery was small. Finally, the court held that a possible award of attorneys' fees would not provide a sufficient incentive for an attorney to take an individual case, especially since the allegation was that all hourly employees were subject to the same unlawful conduct.

The lesson is that simply because an employer builds into arbitration agreements (whether found in employee handbooks or freestanding) a waiver of wage-hour (or other) class actions, there is a good chance they will be found unenforceable.
 

Full post as published by Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights on May 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0196 secs (new cache)