Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyCone v. Bell
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Court has released the opinion in Cone v. Bell(07-1114). The decision is 7-2 (Stevens, J., writing Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, & Breyer, J.J.) in, and the Chief Justice and Justice Alito concurring in separate opinions).
In the 27 years since Gary Cone was convicted of murder and sentenced to death, no Tennessee court has reached the merits of his claim that state prosecutors withheld evidence that would have bolstered his defense and rebutted the State?s attempts to cast doubt on his alleged drug addiction. Today we hold that the Tennessee courts? procedural rejection of Cone?s Brady claim does not bar federal habeas review of the merits of that claim. Although we conclude that the suppressed evidence was not material to Cone?s conviction for first-degree murder,the lower courts erred in failing to assess the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence with respect to Cone?scapital sentence...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on April 28, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Bell Canada
allegedly throttling internet speeds
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Owens v. Guida and Cone v. Bell:
Cone v. Bell highlights need for substance to trump procedure in death penalty cases









