ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Prosecutors Hanging On ? Just Barely ? in Grace Asbestos Case

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

libbyForgive us for the repetitive leads this morning, but it seems that that darn history just keeps repeating itself. So herewith, we bring you echoes of what we’ve already written this morning:

Another day, another set of allegations of prosecutorial misconduct.

That’s right — fresh off the Ted Stevens debacle, the DOJ is staring down another possible embarrassing situation in another high-profile case, this one involving its criminal prosecution of W.R. Grace, the big chemical products company, and five of its executives. The government has charged the group with a handful of crimes in connection with their operation of a vermiculite mine in Libby, Mont. (pictured), which is alleged to have poisoned many of the town’s residents. Click here, here and here for earlier LB posts on the case; here for today’s NYT report; here for the report from the “Grace Case” blog.

The quick background: lawyers for Grace asked last week for the charges to be thrown. They accused prosecutors of repeatedly violating court orders to turn over evidence favorable to the defense and of putting on the stand a star witness whose credibility, they said, has since been destroyed by information that the jury never heard about.

"There's a failure in the process here," Judge Molloy said, addressing one of the prosecutors. "The question is, What do I do about it? I don't know what the remedy is here; you tell me."

According to the NYT, for the most part, prosecutors did not fight back, but said repeatedly that they thought most of the missteps had been small, and that they were sorry for the rest.

But Judge Malloy seemed to see things differently. He ultimately dismissed all charges against one of the five defendants, Robert Walsh, but said he had not yet figured out how to deal with the others.

At one point, Judge Molloy told one of the prosecutors that he has "no faith in anything the Government says."

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on April 28, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0186 secs (new cache)