ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Baristas

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Patent Baristas

Tafas v. Doll: Preparing for the End

By Stephen Albainy-Jenei

ADVERTISEMENTS

The saga of the PTO?s rulemaking authority continued on March 20, 2009 when the Federal Circuit issued its 55 page decision in Tafas v. Doll holding that aside from the rule limiting continuations, the other rule changes were procedural in nature and the PTO does have the rule-making authority to implement the rules limiting the number of claims in each application, providing for Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs) and requiring Examination Support Documents (ESDs).

What happens next is unclear, but the impact of these changes to the rules could be staggering ? especially to the life sciences community and its ability to obtain patents to protect innovation in a potentially new patent regime.

acitafasdollAmerican Conference Webinar Series is now set to present a webinar entitled “Tafas v. Doll ? Dissecting the Decision and Preparing for Resurgence of USPTO Rules Limiting Patent Claims.”

This 90 minute webinar, presented Wednesday, May 20, 2009, at 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Eastern, is set to provide  an in-depth analysis of the recent decision, expert discussion of the next steps of the case, and what you can and should be doing now to prepare for these potential groundbreaking changes to patent protection.

Points of discussion will include:

  • Background of the case and brief analysis of the proposed final rules: 78, 114, 75 & 265
  • Analyzing the details, reasoning and nuances of the decision, including:
  1. Distinguishing between substantive versus procedural rules
  2. Explaining the conflict between Section 120 of the Patent Act and Final Rule 78 limiting continuations
  3. Contrasting the court?s reasoning for holding Rule 78 invalid while upholding the rules regarding claims, ESDs, and RCEs
  4. Examining the criteria discussed for the lower court to consider upon remand
  • Evaluating possible statutory reasons for why Rule 75 could also be under attack
  • What happens next and where do we go from here?
  1. Impact of the rules for patent claim drafting, filing applications, and potential litigation consequences
  2. Practical tips for practitioners on what you should be doing now with your patent applications and portfolio

Download the conference brochure here (pdf).

Related posts:

  1. Tafas v. Dudas: The Continuation Wars Earlier, Dr. Triantafyllos Tafas’ lawsuit, arguing that the proposed U.S....
  2. USPTO to Publish New Claim and Continuation Rules: Will They Improve Efficiency of Patent Examination? The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will publish...
  3. Commissioner John Doll: “We’d Allow Every Patent Application If It Just Met The Requirements” John J. Doll, Commissioner for Patents, US Patent & Trademark...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Full post as published by Patent Baristas on April 27, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0118 secs (new cache)