Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsABA IP Section Seeks Inequitable Conduct Reform
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Donald Zuhn -- The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Tafas v. Doll, in which the CAFC found that new Rule 265 -- which creates the dreaded Examination Support Document (ESD) -- was both procedural and not inconsistent with the Patent Act (see "Tafas v. Doll (Fed. Cir. 2009)"), and the introduction last week of Senator Jon Kyl's patent reform bill (S. 610), which includes an inequitable conduct provision that transfers final determinations of inequitable conduct from the courts to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (see "Senator Kyl Introduces Alternative to Leahy Patent Reform Bill"), re-focused our attention on...Full post as published by Patent Docs on March 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Canadian Government
seeks new law enabling them to search your laptop
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

ABA-IPL Section Submits Views on Inequitable Conduct
Dolak on the Inequitble Conduct Defense in Patent Law
Important Inequitable Conduct Decision: Defendant Must Prove its Case
When Fudging Conduct is Inequitable.
The Clarified Law of Inequitable Conduct









