ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

“Conversations about Law Reform”

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Law Commission of Ontario’s “Conversations about Law Reform” is coming up in about three weeks (May 12th and 13th). There’s a Public Lecture and a full day Symposium.

To provide a backdrop, Michael Tilbury, a Commissioner with the NSW Law Reform Commission in Australia, will deliver a free Public Lecture on the relationship between governments and law commissions at 5:30 pm on Tuesday May 12th. Michael has had plenty of experience negotiating this complex relationship. The NSW Commission, in existence since 1966, is a more traditional model from the LCO, since it receives references from the Attorney General. Tilbury will talk about different models, though, and each raises its own complexities around this crucial relationship.

Wednesday, May 13th, is structured a series of conversations; the first two are on what we mean by law reform and how we carry it out, respectively. To get these first two conversations started, panelists will take a few minutes to talk about their views, their or their organization’s experience in “doing law reform” and then everyone in the audience will be invited to participate (attendance is limited to promote conversation instead of Q&A or a few isolated comments). The last conversation involves everyone from the beginning.

We are webcasting it, but although I thought about it at the start of our organizing, I don’t believe we’ve set up to allow people to send in questions and comments if they’re watching the webcast. I’ve been involved when viewers have sent in questions and I guess my concern is that encouraging the conversation format is a sufficient challenge, without adding the additional challenge of successfully integrating “off-site” questions and comments. (A more sophisticated arrangement with visuals for everyone that would bridge the gap somewhat between on-site and off-site participants isn’t an option for this conference.)

Does anyone have any experience with this conversational format and its affinity with off-site viewing that includes participation by off-site viewers?

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on April 24, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)