Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogPetition Raising Applicability of Booker to section 3583(c)(2) Resentencing Proceedings Set for Conference
By Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
The first petition raising the issue of whether Booker's flat statement that the guidelines are advisory in all contexts includes resentencing proceedings pursuant to Section 3582(c)(2), US v. Rhodes, Docket No. 08-2111,has been set for conference next week, on April 24. The decision below is found at 549 F.3d 833 (10th Cir. 2008).The Petitioner asks the Supreme Court to address the following issue:Did the Tenth Circuit violate United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), by holding that the federal sentencing guidelines were mandatory in sentencing hearings held pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 3582(c)(2), thereby conflicting with the holding of United States v. Hicks, 472 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2007)?The Tenth Circuit had concluded that the Sentencing Commission's policy statement in USSG 1B1...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on April 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

At Last! A Booker Remand from the First Circuit
Tenth Circuit find Booker not applicable in crack retroactivity proceedings
Magwood: AEPDA Bars Claim In 2nd Petition That Could Have Been Raised In First
Links to H.R. 1528 (the Booker-Fix) Materials
A strong pitch to SCOTUS to have Booker apply to crack sentence reductions








