Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense LawyersAt Last! A Booker Remand from the First Circuit
By Tom Lincoln
ADVERTISEMENTS
If United States v. MacKinnon, No. 03-2219 (1st Cir. March 16, 2005) was not remanded for resentencing in light of Booker and the strict standard set up by the First Circuit in United States v. Antonakopoulos, No. 03-1384, 2005 WL 407365 (1st Cir. Feb. 22, 2005), it is hard to imagine any case that would have been remanded with unpreserved Booker error. Following Antonakopoulos (panel opinion by Circuit Judge Sandra L. Lynch), as we discussed here, "defendants would not get a remand for resentencing except in extremely
rare occasions when, for example, the District Judge expressed at the
time of sentencing that he would have imposed a lesser sentence if it
were not for the mandatory nature of the guidelines." Well, in MacKinnon, Hon...continue to full postFull post as published by Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers on March 16, 2005 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Helpful Resources
To suggest a resource or text link placement, contact us.
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CA1: a further remand for time-served and parsimony issues
DC CIrcuit notes, then avoids, circuit split over ex post facto Booker issue
CA1: individualized loss determinations, Booker, and ID theft
Ninth Circuit issues long-awaited en banc opinion on post-Booker universe
Split Third Circuit ruling on guideline calculation errors after Booker
Another notable discussion of Booker ex post issues








