Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Balkinization
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: BalkinizationThe surprisingly quick triumph of the same-sex marriage movement
By Jack M. Balkin
It may now be hard to recall that ten years ago, no state recognized same-sex relationships. On December 20, 1999, Vermont became the first state to give same-sex relationships a status functionally equivalent to marriage when its Supreme Court declared that gay couples were entitled under the state constitution to the same legal rights as married heterosexual couples. The state constitution?s ?common benefits? clause, which required that government benefits be shared equally by the entire community, required that gay people not be excluded from legal benefits and protections available to heterosexuals. The legislature soon responded by enacting a law creating the status of ?civil unions,? with all the rights of marriage but not the name. California soon passed a similar law with no prompting from the courts. In 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court held that gay couples were entitled to marriage licenses, and the state started issuing them in May, 2004. Now three other states recognize same-sex marriage: Connecticut, Iowa, and Vermont. The functional equivalent, denominated ?civil unions? or ?domestic partnerships,? are recognized in four states: California (which briefly recognized them as marriages), New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Oregon.
Taking these eight states together, more than a fifth of the population of the United States lives in a jurisdiction that recognizes same-sex relationships as marriages or their functional equivalent. Based on U.S. Census population figures for 2008: U.S., 304,059,724; Massachusetts, 6,497,967; Connecticut, 3,501,252; Iowa, 3,002,555; Vermont, 621,270; California, 36,756,666; New Hampshire, 1,315,809; New Jersey, 8,682,661; Oregon, 3,790,060. The first four of these call the relationships ?marriage,? while the others use ?domestic partnerships? or ?civil unions.? See Cal. Fam. Code §§297-299.6 (West 2007); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§457-A:1 to 457-A:8 (LexisNexis 2008); N.J. Stat. Ann. §§26:8A-1 to 26:8A-13 (West 2007); N.J. Stat. Ann. §§37:1-28 to 37:1-36 (West 2008); Or. Rev. Stat. note following §106.990 (2007).The eight states combined add up to 64,168,240, or 21% of the U.S. All figures are taken from http://factfinder.census.gov.)
The New York Times, reporting on the Vermont legislature?s decision to recognize such marriages, put the story on the front page, above the fold. I predict that soon similar developments in other states will be less prominently reported. It will simply be too frequent a phenomenon to be interesting.
Full post as published by Balkinization on April 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
Gay Marriage Laws
Where same sex couples can marry
Hawaii Divorce Laws
How to end a marriage in paradise
Divorce Laws
How to end a marriage
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Metoclopramide
Associated with Development of Movement Disorder
Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.
Pork Plant Explosion
IHP Industrial, Triumph Foods, Epstein and Sons, and Missouri Gas Energy pay over $12.3 million in wrongful death and personal injury settlements.
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Medtronic
Recalls Specific Lots of Paradigm Quick-Set Infusion Sets

Editors: The Future of Marriage
Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage - Allies or Adversaries within the Same-Sex Marriage Movement
Triumph Motorcycles recalled for stability defect
San Diego: Christian Marriage Movements Ground Zero
Iowa marriage ruling puts New England in focus









