Obama Citizenship

Concerned Citizens Encouraged to Contact US Attorney Over Eligibility

By Phil

Following up on his recent condemnation of Georgia’s common law grand jury pronouncement, Leo Donofrio, attorney and Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, posted the following admonition for those concerned citizens who believe that the federal government has not properly addressed the President’s alleged ineligibility:

Three US Postal Receipts for Letters to US Attorney Taylor?

People are writing to me and claiming that US Attorney Taylor will never touch the eligibility issue to bring a quo warranto challenging Obama?s title to the office of President.  Many are also saying that we the people have exhausted all legal options and that we must look outside the Constitution for justice.

I say there is no justice outside of the Constitution and that if you sink to that level of thought the true enemies of the Constitution will have defeated you and it forevermore.

But the people have not even come close to doing everything in their power to see that the Constitution is protected.  The Constitutionally proper way to challenge POTUS eligibility is via the DC Code quo warranto statute.

I DO NOT SEE A CONCERTED EFFORT BY ?WE THE PEOPLE? TORESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT US ATTORNEY TAYLOR BEGIN AN INQUIRY IN QUO WARRANTO AS TO OBAMA?S ELIGIBILITY.

If the option fails then you only have yourselves to blame if you haven?t organized a million letters and a million citizen march to the door of the US Attorney?s office.

I have not seen a response from US Attorney Taylor but that doesn?t mean he?s shut the door on bringing a quo warranto inquiry.  I certainly I have not seen a negative response from US Attorney Taylor.He has said nothing publicy either way, so why is everybody giving up on the possibility that our Constitution may be working as we speak?

Did you think US Attorney Taylor would simply make a shotgun decision on something this important?  Don?t you think a complete in depth study of quo warranto, the DC Code, and all possible case law would be necessary for the man to properly come to a decision?  That takes some time.

Furthermore, how many of you actually wrote to the man?  I told you that the prosecutor would need your protection - the protection of an intense public outcry -  in order for him do something this controversial.  Have you given the prosecutor your protection?  Have you written to him?

Three people have written to me and mentioned they have received their green return receipt requested cards proving that their letters were accepted by the US Attorney?s Office.  Three people. I?d be willing to bet that the total number of letters sent to US Attorney Taylor is less than 500 and probably much less than that.

I?ve written extensively on quo warranto and I?ve made the case that the statute is the only possible means by which the POTUS eligibility issue will ever be resolved.   But the people don?t seem to really care enough to contact the US Attorney? so why should the US Attorney believe that this nation will support a decision to challenge Obama?

Based upon the lack of public outcry and the vehement language of hatred used by so many people who comment on the Obama eligibility issue, if I were the US Attorney I?d probably conclude that these advocates are simply partisan instigators concerned with their own political views and not concerned with an objective concern for the Constitution and the nation at large.

If you don?t have the numbers, you won?t get the result you?re looking for.   It?s that simple.  Those who are advocating methods and tactics which violate the Constitution have not done everything in their power to use the Constitutional and legal methods available.  You are just as much an enemy of the Constitution as any other thug.

If every person who was troubled by Obama?s eligibility wrote a letter to US Attorney Taylor and got on the same page, perhaps there might be enough of a public outcry for the US Attorney to move on this issue.  But the forces are split up and divided.  Much of this has been intentional and many have been duped.

You flock to sensational muckrakers spewing emotional diatribes and irrelevant judicial maniacal madness? and you will get what you sow in the end.

There is an apparent divide forming among those with differing opinions on exactly how to go about persuading the government to pay attention to petitions.

Blogger Arlen Williams at InvestigatingObama will be investigating this issue further this coming Monday evening on “The Awakening” on BlogTalkRadio.

-Phil

Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on April 03, 2009 (boomark / email).