ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Marler Blog

A Much Needed Shift of Focus at USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service

By Bill Marler, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

I was pleasantly surprised to read today that the USDA has apparently decided to take notice of the elephant in the room when it comes to the tons of ground beef that consumer purchase every day. That is, grocery stores and other retail establishments routinely add trimmings—the bits of meat leftover from cutting steaks and roasts—to the ground beef they grind each day and put out for sale. And as we have discovered in case after case involving this kind of ground beef, very often the store has no records that would allow the source of the contamination to be traced back to any particular meat processor.

As the recent outbreaks involving retailers like Kroger and Whole Foods have made clear, contaminated trimmings are a real danger to the public health. And what is worse, if grocery stores are not keeping the necessary records, then the true scope of the E. coli O157:H7 problem is not really known. While the USDA requires that trimmings be tested for E. coli O157:H7 if they are going to another meat plant to be ground, there is no such requirement for meat that goes to grocery stores, restaurants, and other retail outlets. So huge numbers of people every day are eating ground beef made that has been made with untested, potentially contaminated meat.

This is why it is a great first step for USDA to develop (as reported at Meatingplace.com, and reprinted here: http://shopsmartkentucky.org/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&homeID=121817) to develop guidance for retailers. But this should not be the only steps taken. Instead of guidance, proper recordkeeping should be required of all retailed. Even better, it is time for the USDA to abolish the indefensible distinction it makes in its E. coli policy, which suggests that this deadly pathogen is an adulterant in trimmings and ground beef, but not on so-called 'intact' cuts of meat—the very cuts from which grocery stores generate the trimmings to make ground beef. It is time that the USDA has a truly zero-tolerance policy for E. coli O157:H7. And to enforce such a policy, the USDA has to once more get serious about a rigorous sampling and testing program at retail. Let's stop using the American public as test subjects where illness and death are the truest signs that the meat supply is not safe.

Full post as published by Marler Blog on April 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0167 secs (new cache)