ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Patent Arcade

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Patent Arcade

New Case: Tetris Co. v. BioSocia Inc. (S.D.N.Y) [Copyright]

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Tetris Co. on March 12, 2009, filed a new lawsuit against BioSocia Inc. for copyright infringement and unfair competition. The suit is based on BioSocia's game Blockles, which is a "tetris-like clone." A screenshot of Blockles from www.iminlikewithyou.com is on the left. As far as this author is aware, Tetris Co. does not have a patent on the game "Tetris," and copyright will not protect functional aspects, so copyright infringement will likely come down to whether BioSocia copied Tetris Co.'s actual expression of the game, i.e., used the same or substantially the same artwork.

According to the complaint, Blockles copied Tetris down to nearly every detail: the geometric playing pieces formed four squares; the long vertical rectangle playing field; the downward, lateral movement of the pieces; and various other effects associated with the game.

The Tetris Co. also claims that Blockles copied the user interface for its multiplayer function, which allows several players to play the game at once and displays separate games in small rectangle?s adjacent to the user?s current game.

Tetris is an immensely popular game, and The Tetris Co. appears willing to spend some dough to protect its market position. But I have to admit, my gut visceral reaction is that unless the aesthetic in Blockles is almost identical to that in Tetris, then it will be difficult to prove copyright infringement given the lack of protection by copyright for functional/useful aspects of a work.

The case is The Tetris Co. et al. v. BioSocia Inc. et al., case number 09-cv-2130, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. We will add this to our list and keep you updated.

Full post as published by Patent Arcade on March 16, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.019 secs (new cache)