Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Dutch Supreme Court Protects Criticism of a Religion From Group Insult Prosecution

By Howard M. Friedman

In an important free speech decision Tuesday, the Supreme Court of Netherlands overturned the conviction of a man who had been charged under Article 137c of the Dutch criminal code with making offensive statements about Muslims. In 2004, after the murder by an Islamic extremist of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, defendant hung a poster in his window reading: "Stop the tumour that is Islam. Theo has died for us. Who will be next? Resist now! National Alliance, we will not bow down to Allah. Join now." The Supreme Court held that offensive statements about a religion do not constitute an insult to "a group of people according to their religion" as that term is used in Article 137c. Here is the Supreme Court's news release in Dutch describing the decision. NIS News and NRC Handelsblad both report on the case.

Drawing a fine line in an attempt to protect criticism of a religion, the Court said that Article 137c is not violated "even if that happens in such a way that the devotees feel their religious feelings are hurt." Criticism of behavior or opinions is not outlawed. Only a remark "explicitly" aimed at a group distinct from others based on its religion can be a group insult. The Court said that the same definitions will apply in the pending prosecution of Dutch politician Geert Wilders for inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims and insulting Muslim worshippers. (See prior posting.)

Full post as published by Religion Clause on March 11, 2009 (boomark / email).