ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> OverRegd - Securities Regulation and Litigation Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: OverRegd - Securities Regulation and Litigation Blog

Government Opposes "Scheme Liability" in Pending U.S. Supreme Court Case

ADVERTISEMENTS

            The U.S. Solicitor General has submitted an amicus curiae brief in a pending U.S. Supreme Court case, requesting that the Court narrow the scope of securities fraud claims so as not to encompass third party actors such as accountants, lawyers, and financial institutions.

            The case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court is StoneRidge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlantic, Inc.  The Court below, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, refused to impose Rule 10b-5 liability on a business that entered into an arms-length non-securities transaction with another business that then used the transaction to publish false and misleading statements to its investors. The Court reasoned that a defendant who does not make a fraudulent misstatement or omission or who does not directly engage in manipulative securities trading practices is at most guilty of aiding and abetting and cannot be held liable under Rule 10b-5.

                  Other amicus have sided with the plaintiff in favor of “scheme liability” that would hold third parties liable for securities fraud. A significant roadblock is the 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Central Bank finding that mere aiders and abettors could not be liable for securities fraud.  The Solicitor General’s amicus brief argues that allowing securities fraud liability under these circumstances would “expose customers, vendors, and other actors far removed from the market to billions of dollars in liability,” and this is “particularly inappropriate” because “such a radical expansion of liability is a task for Congress, not the courts.”

            Oral argument on this case will be heard October 9, 2007.

Full post as published by OverRegd - Securities Regulation and Litigation Blog on August 16, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 13:21:02)