Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> The Corporate Counsel.net Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: The Corporate Counsel.net BlogSEC Proposes Further Section 404 Delay
By dave
SEC Proposes Further Section 404 Delay
The SEC has proposed yet another one-year delay in implementation of an independent auditor’s attestation report on the internal controls for the smallest public companies. As noted in the blog at the end of last year, Chairman Cox had promised this delay in his testimony before the House Committee on Small Business.
Under the proposal, non-accelerated filers would be required to provide auditor’s attestation reports beginning with their annual reports filed for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009. The proposal does not affect the requirement that management complete its own assessment of internal control over financial reporting – which is now required for all filers, regardless of size. The proposing release is out for a 30-day comment period.
The proposed delay in fully implementing Section 404(b) – to over seven years after Sarbanes-Oxley was enacted – coincides with an announcement that the Staff has commenced its previously discussed study of the costs and benefits associated with the auditor attestation requirement for smaller companies. This is supposed to be an analysis of “real world” data in order to measure experience with the recent SEC and PCAOB guidance for management and auditors. The final results of the study are not expected for several months.
Yet Another PIPEs Case Gone Bad
Something else the SEC should consider studying (and fast) is why it keeps getting its critical Securities Act Section 5 claims dismissed in federal District Courts across the land. I recently blogged about the dismissal of the SEC’s Section 5 claims in the case of SEC v Edwin Buchanan Lyon, IV. Only a few weeks after that setback, a judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed similar Section 5 claims in SEC v. Berlacher.
Unfortunately, with these decisions now coming in fast and furious, hedge funds that short in anticipation of PIPEs and then cover with the registered securities are emboldened to continue that strategy in the absence of any swift SEC action to protect the legal position.
I will be discussing these cases in more detail with the great panelists on our webcast – “The ‘Former’ SEC Staff Speaks” – coming up this Wednesday.
Our February Eminders is Posted!
We have posted the February issue of our complimentary monthly email newsletter. Sign up today to receive it by simply inputting your email address!
- Dave Lynn
Full post as published by The Corporate Counsel.net Blog on February 04, 2008 (boomark / email).
Shell Canada Proposes Heavy Oil Refinery
Air and Water at Risk in Michigan
Verizon Wireless
Proposes a $21 Million Early Termination Settlement

ACCC proposes revocation of eBay section 47 exclusive dealing immunity
Trade Secret Law: An Impediment to Trade in Computer Software
"Detainee asks judge to delay 1st Guantanamo trial"
Allocation of Concurrent Delay Damages on Construction Projects
One-year Delay on 404 in the Works







