Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Journals Blogs -> Conflict of Laws
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Journals
: Conflict of LawsJurisdiction in Contract Matters in Brazil
By Gilles Cuniberti
I am grateful to Henry Saint Dahl, the President of the Inter-American Bar Foundation, for contributing this report.
São Paulo Civil Appellate Court, Seventh Chamber (Appeal N0. 312.848-4/4-00): Editoriale Johnson SPA et al.; v. Renaço Comércio e Importação e Indústria Ltda et al., judgment rendered on December 17, 2008
The parties, an Italian publishing house and a Brazilian distributor, entered into a contract for commercial representation in Brazil. The contract was signed in Italy. Alleging contractual breach plaintiff, the Italian publisher, filed a lawsuit in Brazil, against the Brazilian distributor, claiming rescission plus damages.
The Brazilian District Court dismissed the case for lack of Brazilian jurisdiction, based on the fact that the contract was entered in Italy, which made Italian law applicable to solve the two issues raised: rescission and damages.
The Appellate Court held in its majority decision that although the contract was signed in Italy, performance took place in Brazil where defendant distributed plaintiff?s products. It is certain then that although the deal was made in Italy, it was meant to produce effects in Brazil. The case is then controlled by Article 88, paragraph II of the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as Article 12 of the Introductory Act to the Civil Code, both of which grant jurisdiction to the Brazilian court when ?the obligation must be performed in Brazil.?
The Appellate Court further considered that sending the plaintiff to an Italian court would also impose a heavy burden on the Brazilian defendants and even preventing them access to justice and an ample opportunity to defend themselves.
The district-court judgment was annulled and the file was returned to said court with instructions to conform to the appellate decision.
Brazilian attorney André de Almeida provided the text of this decision.
Related posts:
- “Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat” as a “Dispositive” Choice of Law Factor: A Recent Decision from the Second Circuit A divided panel of the Second Circuit held last week...
- Jurisdiction and Class Actions To what extent should a country’s traditional rules for taking...
- Conference: Contract Damages - Domestic and International Perspectives [Although not strictly on private international law, we believe...
Full post as published by Conflict of Laws on February 21, 2009 (boomark / email).
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Expedia
$184 Million Breach of Contract Settlement Reached
Joint Venture
Gallaher Group agrees to pay Reynolds American $387 million contract dispute settlement.
Consulting Contract
Racine Unified School District agrees to pay Public Business Consulting Group a $750,000 settlement.

Lanham Act Applied To Statements Made In Brazil
Brazil Puts Kibosh on Abortion Bill, and More From Around the Globe
Merger Control in Brazil: Maturity








