ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> ACS Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: ACS Blog

Echoes of Heller

ADVERTISEMENTS

In D.C. v. Heller last term, the Supreme Court established the right to bear arms as an individual right rather than one extending solely to participants in a militia or other collective body. However, Heller only considered a gun ban set by Congress, in that municipal regulations in D.C. are set at the federal level. Now, challenges to state gun bans are moving through lower courts at a pace likely to place them before the Supreme Court next term, according to SCOTUSblog’s Lyle Denniston.

Three cases from Illinois have been consolidated around the question of whether the Second Amendment applies to state and local action. The cases were decided in the Northern District of Illinois in early December. There, Senior Judge Milton Shadur ruled that the Second Amendment only protected the right to bear arms from federal action, permitting state interference with gun ownership.

Judge Shadur’s decisions (here in two of the cases, and here in the third case,) were grounded in two prior determinations that the Second Amendment only limits federal action. In 1982, the Seventh Circuit made this ruling in Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, with the Supreme Court refusing to hear the case in the subsequent year. There, the Seventh Circuit cited the 1886 Supreme Court case of Presser v. Illinois, holding the same: the right to bear arms only forbade federal interference with gun ownership.

With recent litigation now on appeal to the Seventh Circuit, both sides are acutely aware of Presser. Arguing to extend the Amendment to the states, the National Rifle Association has made a two-pronged argument in its briefs. First, they claim, Presser did not properly rule on the issue of whether the Amendment applied to the states because it was decided prior to the notion of “incorporating” the Bill of Rights to constrain state action. Alternatively, the NRA argues that Presser is outdated and effectively overturned by more recent precedent.

The Seventh Circuit has yet to schedule oral argument in the cases.

Full post as published by ACS Blog on February 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)