Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Construction Law Blogs -> The South Carolina Construction Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Construction Law
: The South Carolina Construction Law BlogA Lis Pendends, Without More, Will Not Provide Notice of Interest on Property!!!!
By Ryan McCabe
In its recent opinion, Horry County v. Ray, the South Carolina Court of Appeals held that a county's lis pendens alone did not give notice to a mortgagee of the county's interest on property. The county filed its lis pendens before the mortgagee recorded its mortgage. The bank, nevertheless claimed priority interest.
S.C. Code Ann. Section 15-11-20 provides: "From the time of filing [the lis pendens] only, the pendency of the action shall be constructive notice to a purchaser or encumbrancer of the property affected thereby, and every person whose conveyance or encumbrance is subsequently executed or subsequently recorded shall be deemed a subsequent purchaser or encumbrancer and shall be bound by all proceedings taken after the filing of such notice to the same extent as if he were made a party to the action. For the purposes of this section, an action shall be deemed to be pending from the time of filing such notice."
The Court of Appeals then cited the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in South Carolina National Bank v. Cook, 291 S.C. 530, 354 S.E.2d 562 (1987) and stated that a lis pendens cannot be filed earlier than 20 days before a complaint is filed. Therefore, failing to file summons and complaint within 20 days of filing a lis pendens renders the lis pendens ineffective, which also gives no constructive notice to subsequent creditors. As a result, the subsequently recorded mortgage by the bank took priority.
This site and any information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek a competent attorney for advice on any legal matter.
Full post as published by The South Carolina Construction Law Blog on February 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
allegedly failed to provide adequate facilities for the disabled.
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.
JP Morgan Chase & Co
Faces Lawsuit Over Hikes in Credit Card Interest Rate
Prisoner Abuse
Somerset County pays undisclosed settlement for failing to provide adequate securities for inmate assaults.
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.

IRS TARGETS SALE OF CHARITABLE TRUST INTEREST TRANSACTION
IRS UPDATES LIEN PRIORITY REGULATIONS
Colorado Foreclosure Law and Your Association's Superlien
Can The IRS File A Federal Tax Lien On Property Not Belonging To The Taxpayer







