Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Structured Settlements 4RealNew York Structured Settlement Vig Takers May Not Be Able to Hide From Dinallo
By John Darer
The draft regulations issued earlier this week by the New York Insurance Department include rules that establish "minimum disclosure requirements." Those requirements include the nature and amount of compensation, as well as language that tells consumers an agent "may have incentives" to recommend a particular policy "based on the amount of compensation paid." It also includes a mechanism for clients to request information about producers' compensation which was not known at the time of sale - in other words, contingent commissions.
It will be interesting to see how the National Structured Settlement Trade Association reacts to the proposed rules given its very public rejection of the structured settlement transparency initiative, a voluntary effort to provide transparency to tort victims, judges and plaintiff attorneys who work with structured settlement professionals.
The subject of disclosure of factoring kick backs and broker/planner business practices has surprisingly been an extremely volatile topic of discussion in the structured settlement industry. Despite the shocking disclosure that the overwhelming majority of structured settlement broker/settlement planner clientele of Bentzen Funding Solutions are on the take, the overwhelming majority of the industry operates in the shadows and alleyways on the topic. We know people are doing it, but few seem willing to own up to it. This author's Brandeisian effort of "shining light as disinfectant" was even inarticulately labeled McCartheyesque. Any such transparency intiative by the New York Insurance Department should involve mandatory disclosures of ALL PARTIES to whom compensation is made so that CONSUMERS can have a proper understanding about how such compensation affects the pricing and so they have the ability to negotiate.
This author supports an amendment to New York's Structured Settlement Protection Act which would require mandatory disclosure of all parties to whom compensation is made in structured settlement factoring transactions.
Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on February 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
Aetna Settles with New York State for $20 Million
Ferry Crash
New York awards man who had to amputate his leg after the accident a $6.5 million personal injury settlement.
New York City
$1.5 million settlement after a family of four was killed by an off duty drunken police officer.
Negligent Death
Family of New York Times reporter awarded undisclosed settlement for medical malpractice.
Oppenheimer ATM-Free New York Municipals
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

Structured Settlement Credo - 4
Growing the Structured Settlement Market
AIG Structured Settlement Wiki
Pullman & Comley's Structured Settlement Insights-2
Structured Settlement Credo - 5









