ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Balkinization

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Balkinization

Professors? Brief in Seventh Circuit Guns Case Calls for the Restoration of the Privileges or Immunities Clause

By Jack M. Balkin

ADVERTISEMENTS
Back in December, we blogged here that the Supreme Court?s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller would lead to momentous incorporation question, and could open the door to the rejuvenation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, the text in the Fourteenth Amendment that protects substantive fundamental rights against state infringement.


On Wednesday, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in the consolidated cases of McDonald, et al., and National Rifle Association of America, Inc., et al., v. City of Chicago, et al., and Village of Oak Park, arguing that right to keep and bear arms recognized in Heller is ?incorporated? against state action via the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. CAC?s ?friend of the court? brief was filed on behalf of four preeminent constitutional scholars including Balkinization?s very own Jack Balkin.

Our brief echoes CAC?s report, The Gem of the Constitution, which explains that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was intended to be the centerpiece of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the critical constitutional language guaranteeing the fundamental rights of all Americans. In The Gem, we say that ?all Americans should cheer a ruling that finally honors some of our Constitution?s most important text and history,? and we are urging the court to make such a ruling in this case.

Our brief also brings to the fore the surprisingly progressive Reconstruction history of the right to bear arms. It shows that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment sought to constitutionally protect this right against state infringement, in large part because they wanted the newly freed slaves to have the means to protect themselves, their families and their property against well-armed former rebels.

(David Gans is Constitutional Accountability Center's Human and Civil Rights Director, Doug Kendall is CAC's President. For more on the progressive force of the Constitution's text and history, visit our blog, http://www.textandhistory.org/).

Full post as published by Balkinization on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0201 secs (new cache)