Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawNo private right of action against ?state actors? pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights Law
McGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009
The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.
Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. On September 25, 2003, McGovern filed a complaint of race discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. A year later, McGovern received a Right to Sue Letter from the EEOC, but took no further action on his Title VII claim.
On December 21, 2004, the City terminated McGovern?s employment, citing performance and behavioral deficiencies. Almost three years later, McGovern sued the City in the United States District Court alleging race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981.
Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.
Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in Jett v Dallas Independent School District, 491 U.S. 701.
Joining in the views expressed by ?five of [its] sister circuits,? the Third Circuit concluded that ?a private right of action against state actors? cannot be maintained under 42 U.S.C. §1981? insofar as an individual initiating such a lawsuit is concerned.
The full text of the decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/081632p.pdf
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on February 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Owasso, OK
$300,000 settlement reached in civil rights violations lawsuit.
Video Taping Arrest
Harris County pays wrongfully arrested brothers $1.7 million civil rights settlement.

No private right of action against public employers under Sec. 1981
Court Dismisses Free Exercise Claims Against Private Actors
SCOTUS holds that section 1981 creates a private right of action for retaliation claims
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse Revisited
New Group Challenges SAG Leadership







