Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerMORE BREAKING NEWS: Oral argument set in CLRA case, Fairbanks v. Superior Court
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
Thanks to the blog reader who pointed out that yet another case of interest has been set for argument during the first week of March. In Fairbanks v. Superior Court, no. S157001, the Supreme Court will consider whether insurance is a "good" or a "service" within the meaning of the CLRA. Fairbanks is set for argument on Wednesday, March 4, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.
The Court of Appeal's opinion is Fairbanks v. Superior Court, 154 Cal.App.4th 435 (2007), and some of the briefs are collected at these links.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on February 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Countrywide
Faces Class Action over Strong-Arm Tactics used to Intimidate Appraisers
Lake Superior Center Authority
$275,000 settlement reached in construction dispute.
Excessive Arrest
City of Worcester agrees to pay pizza vendor $100,000 settlement after breaking nine bones in his face.
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Murphy City, TX
$255,000 settlement in controversial pedophile news program case.









