ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog

Why San Diego Medical Malpractice Victims Can't Find a Lawyer--A Lesson in MICRA

By Ross Jurewitz

ADVERTISEMENTS

A very good article appeared today on the anewscafe.com website explaining a common plight of California and San Diego medical malpractice victim: they can't find lawyers to take their legitimate injury cases!

The reason, pure and simple, is the California legislature artificially capped damages in medical malpractice cases more than 30 years ago when it enacted the Medical Injury Compensation Act of 1975 ("MICRA") which capped "general damages" (typically called "pain and suffering") at $250,000.

Given that the California Medical Board requires all doctors to publicly report all settlements and judgments over $25,000 and the generally stingy and aggressive nature of insurance companies to drive down claims, almost all medical malpractice cases go to trial. This means that it is very expensive--lawyers representing patients typically spend over $100,000 per case--and time consuming. Moreover, in order for the case to be worth pursuing, it must be a "cap" case (meaning that the jury will definitely award $250,000 if the doctor is found liable).

The practical effect of this law and the marketplace is that injured patients without "cap" cases find it nearly impossible to find a lawyer to help them even when their case has merit.

The Jurewitz Law Group, itself, is extremely selective about which medical malpractice cases it will accept. We typically refer 95% of prospective medical malpractice clients to other firms for a variety of reasons, including that the client does not have a "cap" case.

We hope that this economic reality changes soon. While $250,000 may have been an appropriate damage cap in 1975, it is not today in 2009 after factoring inflation. Injured patients with less than a "cap" case deserve justice just as much as those with "cap" cases.

Full post as published by San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog on February 04, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.015 secs (new cache)