Arbitration & Mediation

Mediators have no interest in justice and fairness; Charlie Irvine bites back!

But read Charlie Irvine's response to senior academic and Honorary Queen?s Counsel Dame Hazel Genn's lecture in December 2008 ADR and Civil Justice: What?s justice got to do with it?

Hazel (can I call you Hazel?) suggests that mediation ?is not about just settlement? but rather ?it is just about settlement' and helpfully suggest that ?perhaps everything can be mediated and the courts can all become pubs and restaurants'. (Ed: warm beer and jellied eel please)

Charlie takes up the story; "In December 2008 I attended the Hamlyn Lecture, delivered in Edinburgh by Dame Hazel Genn. Her topic was Civil Justice and ADR, but she quickly made it clear that her main interest, or target, was mediation. I readied myself for a verbal assault, and got one, but in more trenchant terms than I had anticipated.

While there was nothing new in Dame Hazel?s litany of mediation?s failings, I was startled and a bit stung by the rhetorical flourish with which it was uttered. What?s worse, having worked myself up to overcome the intimidating ambience of Edinburgh?s Old College(the very heart of the Scottish legal establishment) by speaking up for poor little mediation, we were told there would be no questions, just a wee drink.

Well, having had the drink, and some time to reflect, I still want to come back at her. Normally one listens to senior academics respectfully, ascribing a degree of dispassionate objectivity to their pronouncements. But when Dame Hazel turned her withering prose on mediators I was riled. It was particularly galling to hear her... [read more]

Full post as published by mediator blah...blah... on January 30, 2009 (boomark / email).