Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Feminist Law ProfessorsCyber Sexual Harassment
By Ann Bartow
Podcast of a radio show featuring fantastic feminist law prof Danielle Citron, plus Latoya Peterson of Racialicious and Jill Filipovic of Feminste, is available here. Danielle’s referenced law review article, Cyber Civil Rights, can be downloaded here. Below is the abstract:
Social networking sites and blogs have increasingly become breeding grounds for anonymous online groups that attack women, people of color, and members of other traditionally disadvantaged groups. These destructive groups target individuals with defamation, threats of violence, and technology-based attacks that silence victims and concomitantly destroy their privacy. Victims go offline or assume pseudonyms to prevent future attacks, impoverishing online dialogue and depriving victims of the social and economic opportunities associated with a vibrant online presence. Attackers manipulate search engines to reproduce their lies and threats for employers and clients to see, creating digital “scarlet letters” that ruin reputations.
Today’s cyber attack groups update a history of anonymous mobs coming together to victimize and subjugate vulnerable people. The social science literature identifies conditions that magnify dangerous group behavior and those that tend to defuse it. Unfortunately, Web 2.0 technologies accelerate mob behavior. With little reason to expect self-correction of this intimidation of vulnerable individuals, the law must respond.
General criminal statutes and tort law proscribe much of the mobs’ destructive behavior, but the harm they inflict also ought to be understood and addressed as civil rights violations. Civil rights suits reach the societal harm that would otherwise go unaddressed and would play a crucial expressive role. Acting against these attacks does not offend First Amendment principles when they consist of defamation, true threats, intentional infliction of emotional distress, technological sabotage, and bias-motivated abuse aimed to interfere with a victim’s employment opportunities. To the contrary, it helps preserve vibrant online dialogue and promote a culture of political, social, and economic equality.
Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on January 15, 2009 (boomark / email).
Sexual Harassment Policy
Define harassment, outline complaint procedure
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
Sexual Harassment
(in the workplace)
Jury Awards $2 Million in Sexual Harassment Wrongful Termination Suit
Jury Awards $2 Million in Sexual Harassment Wrongful Termination Suit
Student Harassment
Wichita School District pays $45,000 settlement for high school students' harassment lawsuit.
Victim of Sexual Attack Awarded $1.4 Million
Victim of Sexual Attack Awarded $1.5 Million
Recovery One, Cyber Asset, Ascension Recovery - Renovo One LLC
REPOSSESSION DRIVERS - UNPAID OVERTIME
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.

Sexual Harassment: A Strange, Vague "Tort"
Teen Girls the subject of Sexual Harassment
Workplace sexual harassment survey results
Missouri Legislature Passes New Law Making Cyber Harassment a Crime
Chen and Sethi on Effects of Sexual Harassment Law
Researchers Find Rampant Peer Harassment







