ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Ross' Employment Law Blog

No-match letter no-discussion rule was unfair labor practice

ADVERTISEMENTS

Today's NLRB Law Memo reports on an interesting crossover between no-match letters and employer no-discussion rules.

The federal government issues a "no-match letter" when an employee's name does not match up with the reported social security number. It's an attempt to prevent illegal workers from faking social security numbers, and to prevent employers from employing illegals.

When the folks at Ashley Furniture got a no-match letter, they told their employees that they were required to resolve the discrepancy with the Social Security Administration, and instructed them not to discuss their no-match letters with anyone. They also told an employee not to discuss with anyone that he had received a disciplinary warning and that his "green card" had expired.

The problem with that, of course is that ordinarily employees have a statutory right to discuss workplace issues with fellow-employees. Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.

So one of the employees filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB, and the NLRB found that the disciplinary warning, green card issue, and no-match letters constituted Section 7 "workplace matters" which employees were free to discuss among themselves or with outsiders, and that the employer could not lawfully prohibit such discussions absent a legitimate and substantial business justification.

The employer asserted several confidentiality concerns as justification for its "no-discussion" requirement.

The NLRB found that the employer's defense failed because none of its confidentiality concerns outweighed the employees' Section 7 right to discuss the workplace matters at issue. Accordingly, the NLRB found that the employer's no-discussion requirement violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.

The case: Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., 353 NLRB No.71 (12/31/2008).

Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on January 12, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 21:02:47)