ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> InjuryBoard

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: InjuryBoard

Financial Conflicts Largely Ignored By FDA Report Finds

By Jane Akre

ADVERTISEMENTS

Conflict of interest largely ignored by FDA. 

LEARN MORE

 

IMAGE SOURCE: © iStockPhoto/ generic doctor/ twohumans

 

Conflicting interests between drug companies and researchers conducting clinical drug/device trials is a story that makes the headlines almost weekly, especially since the research generated often dictates the prescriptions doctors write nationwide.  

Now a federal inquiry into the practice sheds some light on the appalling lack of oversight that may be allowing that to happen.

A Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) inspector general report issued Monday reviewed 118 clinical trials marketing applications approved by the FDA in 2007.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a hands-off policy over conflicts admitting that the efforts to try and protect patients from such conflicts is, "not worth the effort" reports the New York Times.

Here are some of the findings:

  • Only one percent of clinical investigators disclose a financial interest.
  • 42 percent of FDA-approved marketing applications were missing financial disclosures. Companies are required to disclose any financial interests with the companies they are conducting trials for, but the HHS report found that in 42 percent of the trials, the FDA did not receive the required forms.
  • In 31 percent of marketing application, the FDA did not document reviewing financial disclosures.
  • When there were financial conflicts, in 20 percent of applications, the FDA reviewers did not take action

In 1999, the FDA required drug and device makers to divulge any conflicting interests with doctors who oversee patients involved in clinical trials. The companies are supposed to disclose that information to the FDA, but the inspector general found there was almost no enforcement of those rules.

Part of the problem is that the FDA does not have a complete list of all clinical investigators, therefore cannot check whether every doctor is complying with the rules. The agency reported that collecting and checking that information, though required, was not worth the effort for either the companies or the FDA.

Karen Riley, a spokeswoman for the FDA told the Times that the agency "opposed reviewing doctors' financial conflicts before trials because they represented just one possible source of bias."

The Office of Inspector General's mission is to protect the integrity of the Department of Health and Human Services programs and the people they serve.  The office is calling for consistency in both disclosure and in FDA follow-up. #

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Jane Akre

Full post as published by InjuryBoard on January 12, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)