ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Ross' Employment Law Blog

Guess? What? Deposition question created an unfair labor practice

ADVERTISEMENTS

Monday's NLRB Law Memo contains a reminder: An employer can commit an unfair labor practice during a deposition by asking an employee whether he voted for a union. Yes, even though the question may have been relevant, and even though the employer had no illegal motive in asking the question.

Chinese Daily News, 353 NLRB No. 66 (Dec. 22, 2008).

The NLRB held that the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act when its attorney asked an employee union supporter during a deposition - which was taken in connection with the employer's defense of a class-action wage-and-hour lawsuit brought by some of its employees - whether the employee, who was a supportive declarent in the motion for class certification, had "vote[d] for the Union to win the election[.]"

The Board applied the test set forth in Guess?, Inc., 339 NLRB 432 (2003)

The Board made two assumptions, for the purpose of argument:

  • that the deposition question at issue was relevant to the litigation. 

  • that the questioning did not have an illegal objective.  

However, the Board found that the employee's substantial Section 7 interest in maintaining the confidentiality of his election vote outweighed the employer's need for the information concerning his vote for the purpose of developing its defense to the lawsuit, i.e., that the class should not be certified because the plaintiffs would not act in the best interests of the class, and that one of the plaintiffs and the supportive declarents, including the employee, were biased against the employer because they were Union supporters.  

The Board therefore concluded that the deposition question regarding how the employee voted in the election constituted an unlawful interrogation.

My view: Nice reminder that employer lawyers dealing with issues that may have nothing at all to do with interacting with a union need to keep the National Labor Relations Act in the backs of their minds.

More on this case from Workplace Prof Blog: Company's Deposition Question Violates NLRA. 

Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on January 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0146 secs (new cache)