Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Ross' Employment Law BlogGuess? What? Deposition question created an unfair labor practice
Monday's NLRB Law Memo contains a reminder: An employer can commit an unfair labor practice during a deposition by asking an employee whether he voted for a union. Yes, even though the question may have been relevant, and even though the employer had no illegal motive in asking the question.
Chinese Daily News, 353 NLRB No. 66 (Dec. 22, 2008).
The NLRB held that the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act when its attorney asked an employee union supporter during a deposition - which was taken in connection with the employer's defense of a class-action wage-and-hour lawsuit brought by some of its employees - whether the employee, who was a supportive declarent in the motion for class certification, had "vote[d] for the Union to win the election[.]"
The Board applied the test set forth in Guess?, Inc., 339 NLRB 432 (2003)
The Board made two assumptions, for the purpose of argument:
that the deposition question at issue was relevant to the litigation.
that the questioning did not have an illegal objective.
However, the Board found that the employee's substantial Section 7 interest in maintaining the confidentiality of his election vote outweighed the employer's need for the information concerning his vote for the purpose of developing its defense to the lawsuit, i.e., that the class should not be certified because the plaintiffs would not act in the best interests of the class, and that one of the plaintiffs and the supportive declarents, including the employee, were biased against the employer because they were Union supporters.
The Board therefore concluded that the deposition question regarding how the employee voted in the election constituted an unlawful interrogation.
My view: Nice reminder that employer lawyers dealing with issues that may have nothing at all to do with interacting with a union need to keep the National Labor Relations Act in the backs of their minds.
More on this case from Workplace Prof Blog: Company's Deposition Question Violates NLRA.
Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on January 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
EB-1 and EB-2 Visa Status
Obtaining a Green Card Without Going Through the Labor Certification Process
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Valero Energy
Faces National Labor Class Action
US Postal Service Workers
File Labor and Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Employment
Employee rights including labor law, harassment, safety, unpaid overtime, discrimination and union disputes.

Company's Deposition Question Violates NLRA
NLRB Issues Unfair Labor Practice Checklists
Hirsch on Starbucks Union Case
For A Waiver of Past Practices To Be Effective The Language In The CBA Must Be Clear And Unambigious








