ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Truth on the Market

Interim Final Rules Amending Parts III and IV Rules of FTC Rules of Practice Issued

ADVERTISEMENTS

The FTC announced today that it has approved a notice adopting interim final rules amending Parts III and IV of its rules of practice. As boring as that sound, this is a big deal. Here is the Federal Register notice. There are a number of changes, for instance, deadlines are imposed to expedite the pre-hearing phase such that the evidentiary hearing will be held five months from the date of complaint in cases in which the FTC is seeking a preliminary injunction under 13(b) and eight months otherwise. The proposed rules generated quite a bit of public comment. As one can imagine, Whole Foods is a vocal opponent to these rule changes. One only need read their two public comments (here and here) to get a sense of the flavor of the debate. For instance, the opening line of the second link begins:

The Commission’s proposals are egregious government regulation that should not be adopted. The proposed rules are unnecessary, ill-advised, and unfair. If adopted, they would create administrative procedures that are unjust and deprive parties litigating before the Commission of their due process rights.

No Alice in Wonderland quote like the APA complaint (see Thom’s post here). But no pulled punches either. See also the comments from Arnold and Porter (Robert Pitofsky and Michael Sohn) and the ABA (James Wilson).

In related news, Whole Foods has apparently requested to depose Commissioner Rosch and obtain staff emails related to the investigation:

The retailer wants to depose Commissioner Thomas Rosch, a Republican on the FTC, because he voted to investigate the merger while also briefly acting as the internal FTC judge hearing the case. “We think there’s an inference to be drawn that Commissioner Rosch was in contact with investigative staff,” said Lanny Davis, a lawyer for Whole Foods, pressing to obtain e-mails between Rosch and the staff.

This doesn’t look like its going away any time soon.

Full post as published by Truth on the Market on December 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)