ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Police chief captain wins judgment in officers' suit over video camera installed in locker room

ADVERTISEMENTS
strongPolice chief captain wins judgment in officers' suit over video camera installed in locker room/strongbr /Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; Reproduced with permission. Copyright © 2008, Mitchell H. Rubinstein, Esq., Adjunct Professor of Law, St. Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/"http://lawprofessors.typepad.com:80/adjunctprofs//abr /br /DeVittorio v. Hall, ____F.Supp. 2d___(SDNY Nov. 18, 2008 ) a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/files/121645-1.wpd"Download 121645-1.wpd/a is a very interesting case. Police Officer plaintiffs alleged that the police chief and a captain installed a video camera in the police locker room and allegedly used the equipment to listen to private conversations.br /br /Two plaintiffs also claimed retaliation, violating their First Amendment rights, after complaining of the camera. Seeking summary judgment, defendants asserted that the camera never worked and never had audio capability. Discussing Thompson v. Johnson County Community College, Trujillo v. City of Ontario and Avila v. Valentin-Maldonado, the court granted judgment in favor of the defendant. Because there was no reasonable expectation of privacy and no search, plaintiffs did not show their Fourth Amendment rights violated.br /br /Further, plaintiffs' complaints about the camera's installation did not address a matter of public concern. Thus, plaintiffs did not engage in constitutionally protected speech and lacked a claim for violation of their First Amendment rights.br /br /Mitchell H. Rubinstein

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on December 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/06/26 21:03:24)