ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

Amish Object to Putting "Mark of the Beast" On Cattle

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS
pThe U.S. Department of Agriculture recently moved to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a group of Amish farmers who object to putting the "mark of the Beast" on their cattle.  The specific "mark" they are worried about is a radio-frequency ID tag that is being required by the state./p pThe plaintiffs are Michigan residents who are mostly members of the Old Order Amish Church.  While most of their claims are based on administrative law, they also say that being forced to span style="font-family: Arial;"use "an electronic numbering system for their animals constitutes some form of a 'mark of the beast' and/or represents an infringement of their 'dominion over cattle and all living things' in violation of their fundamental religious beliefs."  They argue that forcing them to accept the mark (or /spango out of business) would therefore violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act./p p/p pPlaintiffs cited about a dozen Bible verses on which their beliefs are founded.  The Book of Genesis -- sort of the emMarbury v. Madison/em of Biblical precedent -- says that man was granted dominion over "the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and the cattle, and over all the wild animals and all the creatures that crawl on the ground."  a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/genesis/genesis1.htm" target="_blank"Genesis 1:26 (New American Standard)/a.  I think there might be a few things missing from that list, but it's probably a translation issue.  I would still suggest going with the broader a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201:26amp;version=9;" target="_blank"King James Version/a, which gives dominion over "the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, emand over all the earth/em, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth."  (Emphasis added.)  Personally I think it's especially important that we get ahold of the creeping things that creepeth, which is another reason I like this one better./p pThe other problem is that the Beast, when he showeth up, shall provide that "no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the Beast or the number of his name."  a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelations%2013amp;version=49#en-NASB-30927" target="_blank"Revelation 13:17 (NAS)/aem.  /emAnd accepting the mark is said to have somewhat more serious consequences, too, like being killed and then thrown into a lake of fire to burn for eternity.  emSee, e.g./em, Revelation 14:9-11, 16:2-16, 19:20, 20:4 (NAS).  This the Amish would prefer to avoid./p pSincerely held religious beliefs, of course, are protected by the First Amendment and federal law.  RFRA prohibits any substantial burden on a person's exercise of religion unless the governmental interest is compelling and the government has chosen the "least restrictive means" of furthering it.  42 U.S.C. sec. 2000bb-1.  Plaintiffs say that the government's stated interest (limiting disease) may be compelling, but requiring RFID tags is not the least restrictive means of furthering that./p pIn its motion to dismiss, the U.S. Department of Agriculture argued that its provisions are "voluntary," and that it's the state that actually requires them.  Thus doth it place the Land of Michigan in league with Satan, at least for purposes of the U.S. Code./p pLink: a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/11/bush-administra.html" target="_blank"Wired's Threat Level Blog (Nov. 13, 2008)/a/pdiv class="feedflare" a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LoweringTheBar?a=f51gO"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LoweringTheBar?i=f51gO" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LoweringTheBar?a=bcU5o"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LoweringTheBar?i=bcU5o" border="0"/img/a /divimg src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LoweringTheBar/~4/492207291" height="1" width="1"/

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on December 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)