Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance BlogNegotiated Cash Acquisitions of Public Companies in Uncertain Times
By Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance
Until the current crises in the financial markets, negotiated acquisitions of public companies had been documented by a form of merger agreement which had evolved into an almost standard “seller friendly” template. This standard model agreement reflected the same factors which contributed to the vibrant M&A activity of recent years: readily available financing, rising stock markets, stable or improving economic and industry conditions, and high levels of confidence in business and financial fundamentals. Combined with the negotiating leverage provided to companies seeking to sell themselves by the generally large and seemingly ever-expanding universe of potential buyers, both strategic and financial, as well as sources of financing willing to assume syndication or underwriting risks, these factors resulted in merger agreements intended to provide sellers with a high level of certainty that a transaction would be completed. With the substantial erosion, if not disappearance of each of the factors underpinning the justification for the standard merger agreement, merger agreements should adapt to the new environment. Therefore, a new paradigm seems likely for acquisitions for cash in which the buyer does not have cash on hand sufficient to pay the acquisition price and any necessary refinancing of seller debt.
My firm has prepared a memorandum entitled “Negotiated Cash Acquisitions in Public Companies in Uncertain Times,” which considers how merger agreements may change as parties to transactions seek to allocate risks to closing and limit their liability. Written primarily by Peter S. Golden, with assistance from David Shine and me, the memorandum considers reverse break-up fees, forms of “seller financing,” material adverse change clauses, express financing conditions, buyer best effort covenants, ticking fees and other aspects of merger agreements that may adapt to the new M&A and financing climate.
The memorandum is available here.
Full post as published by The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog on December 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Meta Financial Group, Inc CASH Securities Fraud
Meta Financial Group, Inc CASH
Cell Phone Use
Can Increase Risk of Brain Cancer 5 Times
Negligent Death
Family of New York Times reporter awarded undisclosed settlement for medical malpractice.
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Ford Focus
Consumer Class Action Settles for Cash Refunds

Discussion paper released on creeping acquisitions law
New GAO Reports on Defense Acquisitions and Defense Contracting
ABA's "2007 Strategic Buyer/Public Target Deal Points Study"
Is the Bar becoming a two-tier profession









