ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Elder Law Blogs -> Law Office of Donald D. Vanarelli Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Elder Law

: Law Office of Donald D. Vanarelli Blog

Director of Medicaid upholds the denial of nursing home Medicaid benefits to applicants who paid family members for care under Life Care Contracts

By dvanar

ADVERTISEMENTS

As I reported in a blog post in October at http://www.dvanarelli.com/blog/2008/10/07/nj-judge-recently-ruled-that-a-medicaid-applicants-prepayment, ALJ Paone ruled, in a case entitled C.S. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services and Union County Board of Social Services, that Medicaid applicants who prepaid for personal care services to be provided in the future by family members under Life Care Contracts were ineligible for Medicaid because the prepayments constituted transfers of assets for less than fair market value, subjecting the applicants to the imposition of penalty periods under the Medicaid program. The judge reasoned that,since the value of an asset under the Medicaid regulations [N.J.A.C. 10:71-4.1(d)] is defined as ? the price that the resource can reasonable be expected to sell for on the open market in the particular geographic area…?, and since the Life Care Contracts in issue prohibited the sale, transfer or assignment of any rights or benefits conferred by the contract, the ?contracts lack[ed] intrinsic value and, thus, possessed no fair market value?.

The parties filed exceptions, and the case was reviewed by the Director of the state Medicaid agency. The Director recently filed his final agency decision, affirming the ALJ?s decision and finding the Medicaid applicants ineligible for Medicaid. The Director held that:

[N]one of the Petitioners have received fair market value for the assets transferred to their children and grandchildren and that Respondents properly imposed a transfer penalty. These “care agreements”, set up either just prior to or just after applying for Medicaid benefits, serve as a vehicle to transfer assets to these relatives for some specious jobs that may or may not occur at a later date.

The Director?s decision is attached here - cs-es-lk-v-dmahs1

Full post as published by Law Office of Donald D. Vanarelli Blog on December 17, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0164 secs (new cache)