ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Obama Citizenship Blogs -> The Right Side of Life

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Obama Citizenship

: The Right Side of Life

Lightfoot v. Bowen: Denied by Justice Kennedy, Resubmitted to Chief Justice Roberts

By Phil

ADVERTISEMENTS

Dr. Orly Taitz DDS, counsel for Lightfoot v. Bowen, has had her stay application denied by Associate Justice Kennedy:

Dec 17 2008 Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.

However, she comments that the case is being resubmitted to Chief Justice Roberts:

I decided to write to Roberts. It will be an open letter, that will be posted on the Internet, it will be read at the numerous radio stations around the country, including the radio stations around all the military bases, it will be in the video form on U-tube, the whole country will be watching him.

Dr. Taitz writes further in her commentary that she is using the “process of elimination” to try to figure out which Justices are voting against giving a case hearing in Conference…

Although Dr. Taitz has the best of intentions at heart, this kind of deductive speculation is built on a faulty premise, in my view. While she certainly has the privilege of being able to resubmit her emergency stay application to whichever other Justice besides Kennedy she pleases, their collective actions in Conference will never be known to anyone outside of that circle of Justices, as it should be. Cases should be reviewed without thoughts of political expendiency.

Further, I think that Dr. Taitz is failing to consider that it is highly likely that the previous cases already considered were denied their emergency stays not necessarily because of the content of their claims, but rather because the Supreme Court has never been likely to stop the Legislative branch from fulfilling its constitutional duties (e.g.: the Electoral College poses no harm by having voted, per se, on a President-elect). Instead, the Supreme Court should be reminded by way of a follow-up suit after the Legislative branch has exhausted the electoral process that the chosen nominee, President-elect Barack Hussein Obama, is very likely an ineligible candidate for the presidency.

-Phil

Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on December 17, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)