Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation BlogChancery Stays Discovery Pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.
TravelCenters of America LLC v. Brog, (Del. Ch., Nov. 21, 2008), read opinion here. The Chancery Court issued two prior opinions in this case, one of which was especially noteworthy, and both were summarized here.
In this letter ruling, the court discussed the discretionary factors applied by the court in deciding whether to stay discovery pending a potentially dispositive motion. In the course of explaining its decision, the court emphasized that discovery should not be used as a weapon, and that even one deposition can be costly to prepare for or defend.
The court also discussed the potential impact of res judicata on some of the co-defendants who had not filed the dispositive motion, and the court made its point by citing to case law that described the penalties for pursuing frivolous claims.
Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on December 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Marriott
Hourly Wage Class Action Settlement Pending
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Securities Settlement
GMH Trust Securities to pay $8.75 million in pending class action suit.

P.R. 3-1(c) and the requirement of separate claim charts
Summary Judgment Granted for Defendant on Patent License Defense
Summary Judgment During Discovery OK, Attorneys' Fees Using Wrong Legal Standard Not So Much
Novell Objects to SCO's Motion for Judgment on Pleadings on Novell's Claims for $$








