Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Orange Book Blog: At the Intersection of Patent Law and FDA Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Orange Book Blog: At the Intersection of Patent Law and FDA LawSanofi Prevails Over Apotex in Plavix Appeal
By Aaron Barkoff
Sanofi-Synthelabo et al. v. Apotex, No. 2007-1438 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
The Federal Circuit today affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, following a 2007 bench trial, that Sanofi's U.S. Patent No. 4,847,265 is not invalid for anticipation or obviousness. The '265 patent covers clopidogrel bisulfate, the active ingredient in Plavix.
For today's opinion, click here.
More later...
Full post as published by Orange Book Blog: At the Intersection of Patent Law and FDA Law on December 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Plavix and Nexium
A Potentially Dangerous Combination
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict

Apotex cant stop sticky platelets without a patent
Canadian Supreme Court Confirms Plavix Patent Despite Evergreening Charges
Sanofi wins over Apotex in PLAVIX battle in Canada
Sanofi sues Apotex over Taxotere
Apotex v. Sanofi - Canadian Supreme Court Decision








