Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

Third Circuit blocks deportation of Egypt detainee despite 'no torture' pledge

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Friday ruled that an Egyptian Christian who could face torture in Egypt may challenge his deportation from the United States. Sameh Khouzam fled to the US in 1998 allegedly to escape religious persecution. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawyers representing Khouzam argued before the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania that the US government was not abiding by its obligations under the UN Convention Against Torture by relying on assurances from the Egyptian government that Khouzam would not be tortured if he were returned to authorities in Egypt. In upholding the district court's decision to block Khouzam's deportation, Judge Marjorie Rendell wrote: The alien must have an opportunity to present, before a neutral and impartial decisionmaker, evidence and arguments challenging the reliability of diplomatic assurances proffered by the Government, and the Government's compliance with the relevant regulations. The alien must also be afforded an individualized determination of the matter based on a record disclosed to the alien.The court held that the district court had no jurisdiction over Khouzam's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and vacated the order granting that petition. The court also held that they had jurisdiction over Khouzam's petition for review, and that Khouzam was denied due process. They granted his petition for review, and vacated the termination of his deferral of removal. Khouzam originally came to the US seeking asylum, but was detained by US authorities based on claims by Egyptian authorities that he was a murder suspect in his home country. Khouzam's case marks the first time a US court has addressed whether the government can lawfully rely on assurances from foreign governments to deport detainees to countries with a record of engaging in torture. Friday's decision could have important ramifications in the upcoming case of Arar v. Ashcroft that will be argued before an en banc sitting of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit next week. In that case, Canadian citizen Maher Arar is seeking a declaratory judgment against US government officials for deporting him to Syria, where he was tortured despite Syrian assurances. In April this year the Court of Appeal in London blocked two separate orders to extradite two terror suspects to Libya and another convicted terrorist to Jordan, citing concerns that they would face torture and be denied a fair trial on arrival despite the fact that the UK had signed agreements with both countries under which they had guaranteed that deportees would not face abuse on their return. The court ruled that those agreements, much maligned by rights groups, were insufficient.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on December 06, 2008 (boomark / email).