ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

Colorado Case Shows How Internet Rants Become Criminal Charges

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS
<p><font size="2"><strong>Source: </strong><em>Crime and Justice News, </em>December 4, 2008.</font></p> <p><font size="2">"Locked in a visitation dispute with his former girlfriend over their young daughter, J.P. Weichel of Ft. Collins, Co., wanted to vent, says the Los Angeles Times. Weichel, 40, allegedly posted comments about the woman on the Craigslist 'rants and raves' forum, accusing her of child abuse and welfare fraud and making crude comments about her sex life. Unlike the majority of libel cases, which are tried in civil court, authorities have taken the unusual step of charging Weichel with a crime. Colorado is one of a dwindling number of states with a criminal law against libel. It dates to the 19th century and is rarely used." </font></p> <p><font size="2">"Larimer County Distrist Attorney Larry Abrahamson said the law applied precisely to what Weichel was accused of doing. 'Being a jerk isn't necessarily grounds for felony prosecution,' said Mark Silverstein of the American Civil Liberties Union. Gregory Lisby, a communications professor at Georgia State University, has tracked criminal libel prosecutions. He said the states that retained such statues -- there are 17, according to free-speech groups -- had simply not updated laws from English common law. His research shows that criminal libel cases have dropped, but the Internet could reverse that, he said. People don't realize that scathing postings or e-mails can make them liable for defamation charges. 'More and more people view the online world as a free-rant place,' Lisby said. 'They think it's par for the course, but they're setting themselves up for lawsuits' or prosecution." </font></p> <p><a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001odio6P2hO2_UtxH_-a2Seh4Tfo3QD0Q39rc3az9qKjyE6pd5lzbLOQI4RDoAGCqgg54k7dEKn0KN7ybMeLgrE-faTuF6nVUPBfOFMhqy5eKhK7OCC99x3OAbU1K0ADED20KqiHUeRHHJUydSVHpVy8ssBT3swGrrpS9s4a07N_QJV3LkjtuO3pUiJApT2Zvhn1KmmsRUcswazBrfTC7kOQ4ig7pz_G5o" shape="rect" color="#0000FF" target="_blank"><font size="2">Los Angeles Times</font></a></p>

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on December 05, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0181 secs (new cache)