ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

Harvard Professor Opines on Scalia's "Gollywaddles"

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Last month, Jay Wexler spoke to noted language expert Steven Pinker and asked him where Justice Scalia might have come up with the term "gollywaddles," which Scalia used during oral argument this term in FCC v. Fox Television Stations.  Wexler is a former Ginsburg clerk and prolific writer who has written a book (due out next summer) about the church-and-state dilemma in America.  (He's also a very funny writer whose essays have appeared in McSweeney's and the Green Bag, among other places.)  Pinker is a Harvard psychology professor who has written several books of his own, and who conveniently lives in Wexler's building.

Pinker's conclusion: "I am pretty sure that Scalia made up 'golly waddles' on the spot."  There's more at the link below, but that's the gist of it.

There might be an issue here as to whether "gollywaddles" is one word or two.  The official transcript reports it as "golly waddles," but that could be a transcription error.  Scalia could have intended it as one word - possibly drawing it out in the way Gomer Pyle might have said it? - and the reporter (never having heard the term before, of course) could have transcribed it as two.  I doubt that would affect Professor Pinker's opinion, but we should get it right for posterity.

It occurred to me that the official recording of the oral argument in FCC might answer this question, in addition to the likely substantial entertainment value of, for example, listening to Justice Stevens spell out the word "dung."  Unfortunately, however, it appears that unlike the transcripts, recordings of Supreme Court oral arguments are not immediately available.  The world will have to hold its breath until the National Archives make this priceless information available sometime during the next Court term.

You can read the rest of Pinker's opinion, and more about Jay Wexler's upcoming book, "Holy Hullabaloos," at the link below.

Link:  Holy Hullabaloos

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on December 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0118 secs (new cache)