Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Tech Law Advisor
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Tech Law AdvisorMichigan Law Review Symposium on Patent Law
By Kevin Heller
Dear Mr. Heller:
The Michigan Law Review's companion journal First Impressions today
published an online symposium on the Supreme Court, the Federal Circuit, and Patent Law. The symposium takes place against a backdrop of three recent Supreme Court decisions-KSR v. Teleflex, Microsoft v. AT&T, and eBay v. MercExchange-on patent law.
A diverse group of authors explores whether these cases, considered
together, represent a recent upheaval in patent law and redefine the
relationship between the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court or if such predictions are overblown.
University of Michigan Law Professor Rebecca S. Eisenberg contends that the Federal Circuit's control over patent law remains little diminished by the Court's recent foray into patent jurisprudence and argues that the most significant impact of KSR may be to embolden the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to reject more patent applications for obviousness without fear of reversal.
pdf
George Washington University Law Professor John F. Duffy argues that the Supreme Court's reform of patent law substance and procedure was predictable and that KSR's importance derives from the fact that it highlights many separate trends that are reshaping the patent system.
pdf
Patent litigator Harold C. Wegner believes that the Microsoft case revealed the balkanized nature of the Federal Circuit and that KSR, through which the Supreme Court created a unified message, will therefore be crucial to the Federal Circuit under future Chief Judge Randal Rader.
pdf
Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Eli Lilly & Co. Robert A. Armitage proposes that Congress adopt the National Academy of Sciences' recommendations for reforming patent law rather than pursuing "anti-troll" objectives and simultaneously defends the judiciary's successful track record of responding to common criticisms of anti-trolls without legislative intervention.
pdf
Patent litigators Stephen G. Kunin and Andrew K. Beverina explain KSR's effect on patent law and outline lessons that case suggests for patent prosecution and litigation.
pdf
To download a PDF of the entire symposium, feel free to click here.
Additional First Impressions content is available at
http://www.michiganlawreview.org/
Full post as published by Tech Law Advisor on October 17, 2007 (boomark / email).
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Michigan Employment Law
alleged violations of Michigan labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Suit Filed On Behalf of 400,000 Michigan Medicaid-Dependents Denied Access to Dental Healthcare
Michigan Medicaid Sued Over Dental Healthcare

Michigan Law Review Online Electoral College Reform Symposium
Michigan Law Review Symposium on Electoral College Reform
Electoral College Reform at Michigan's First Impressions
Michigan Law Review (FI) Symposium on the Electoral College
UCLA Law Review Second Amendment Symposium:








