Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice"Why Apple Got Sued in Texas" - Wall Street Journal - Nov. 24, 2008
By Michael Smith
Good short article in the Wall Street Journal's Business Technology section here yesterday by reporter Ben Worthen on the recent patent case filed against Apple in the Eastern District of Texas. Ben goes into the background of the district's patent docket (the well-known Texas Instruments story) and the changes in the docket from the "happy years" for plaintiffs from roughly 2004 to 2006 which ended with the "annus horribilis" of 2007. The story end with the memorable quote (from me) that "[t]his is a good place to get sued" which I stand behind. Good place to file a case too, of course.
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on November 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Texas Employment Law
alleged violations of Texas labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Milestone LCD TV Wall Mounts
Recalled
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Apple Faces iPad Class Action
Apple Faces iPad Class Action
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.

The Risk Tolerance of Tort Victims in Today's Market
Apple settles with Klausner over iPhone
The Wall Street Journal Finally Gets Enron Right
Wall Street Journal law blog blooper on court size







