Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term LibraryU.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit May Award Default Judgment Due To Tampering With Electronic Evidence
By David Badertscher, PLL
Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on November 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Hardcore Energy Drinks
FDA, Health Canada Warn of Suspected Tampering
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
FDA
Warns About Electronic Cigarettes

Seventh Circuit reverses trademark damages award in default judgment because wrong standard applied
Appeal is from denial of Rule 60 motion, not underlying judgment
Default Judgment Reversed Because of Procedural Error
COA Holds That Plaintiff Need Not Move For Entry Of Default Before Moving For Default Judgment
First Circuit: Don't expect to win on appeal if you admit 7 of 8 likelihood of confusion factors
Third Circuit: Evidence of secondary meaning must correspond to the asserted mark







