Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Spotlight
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP SpotlightUSPTO Removes Retroactivity from Notice Requirement in its Enjoined Rules Limiting Patent Claims and Continuations
By Jim Singer
Full post as published by IP Spotlight on August 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Language Requirements for Citizenship
Naturalization without an English language test
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Florida Medicaid
Limiting Coverage of Drugs for Kids
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Austin and Keebler Branded Peanut Butter Sandwich Crackers
Kellogg Removes Inventory
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.

Examination Support Document (ESD) COuld Add $26,000 to Patent Costs
Is the USPTO Trying to Put Itself In A Better Light On Appeal
USPTO Clarifies Effective Dates of Claims and Continuation Rules
USPTO News: Enjoined Rule Will Not Be Applied Retroactively . . . If PTO Prevails in Tafas v. Dudas
USPTO Loses Continuation Rules Lawsuit







