Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: Las Vegas Trademark AttorneyArticle Highlights Intel?s Aggressive Trademark Enforcement
By Ryan Gile

Back in July, I highlighted (link here) an opposition filed Intel against a company that was seeking to register the mark INTELLEQUITY (an opposition which is still pending with the parties continuing to extend the time for the applicant to answer while the parties engage in settlement discussions). See Intel Corporation v. Business Development Partners, LLC, Opposition No. 91185394 (T.T.A.B. Filed July 23, 2008).
An article by Zusha Elinson published on Law.com earlier this week (link here) highlights some of Intel?s other aggressive trademark infringement lawsuits.
According to the article, Intel has filed 15 trademark infringement and/or trademark dilution actions this year against companies with the word ?intel? in their name. You can see the list for yourself on Justia (although I only count 14 actions, one of which is likely a declaratory judgment filed in Florida three days before Intel brought suit in California).
The article spotlights one particular suit against Barry Hood who received a 108-page trademark-infringement lawsuit from Intel for using the name Intellelectric for his sole proprietorship. The article also notes Hood?s unsuccessful attempt to get help from Pre-Paid Legal Services because the ?trademark dispute was a pre-existing condition and not covered by his plan.? Interestingly, however, Hood?s accountant apparently negotiated a payment from Intel of $3,500 to allow Hood to change his name (Intel having apparently originally offered him $1,500 to change the name).
Intel also sued a travel agency (Intellife Travel), an investment advisory business (Insider Intel), and an Ohio telecom company (Intelcom). The travel agency, acting pro se, fought back against Intel for about a month (their cause having caught the attention of TechCrunch blogger Erick Schonfeld in his post ?Intel Is Worried You Might Think It Is A Chinese Travel Agency? which includes a copy of the complaint received and some of the back and forth correspondence). The agency apparently reached its own confidential settlement with Intel ? but as of today, the agency?s website www.intellifetravel.com is still up and running.
Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on November 15, 2008 (boomark / email).
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Adidas Imitators
Payless Shoesource to pay $304.6 million settlement in trademark lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
PhotoCop Tickets
Minneapolis to pay $2.6 million settlement in traffic enforcement lawsuit.
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Division of Immigration Health Services
allegedly drugged deported immigrants with sedatives.

Trademark protection by Intel-ligent design
Patent Reexamination Used to Stall Patent Enforcement
More on WARF going after Intel
Initial Reaction to INTEL v CPM Case
Kovacic reverses Majoras: FTC Opens Intel Antitrust Investigation
The Costs of International Antitrust Enforcement and Superficial Convergence








