Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment

Criminal Law

: Fourth Amendment

Single room occupancy buildings are not a closely regulated industry

By John Wesley Hall, Jr.

Single room occupancy buildings are not a closely regulated industry to which the city can continually enter under an administrative search exception. San Joaquin Motel & Hotel Propery Owners Ass'n v. City of Stockton, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91766 (E.D. Cal. June 18, 2008).* A motion to suppress establishes a defendant's claim that he is an aggrieved party of the search at issue, and the state does not have to prove that. People v. Jorlantin, 2008 Colo. LEXIS 1002 (November 10, 2008).* Brooks v. State, 292 Ga. App. 445, 664 S.E.2d 827, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 803 (2008), posted here, had state cert granted, Brooks v. State, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 95 (November 3, 2008): This Court is particularly concerned with the following issue or issues: Whether the State must demonstrate "reasonable grounds" to justify a search or seizure despite the existence of a validly imposed condition of probation or parole that prospectively waived the probationer or parolee's Fourth Amendment rights...continue to full post

Full post as published by Fourth Amendment on November 15, 2008 (boomark / email).